tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6985506669240251538.post7368898576256565761..comments2023-06-04T09:01:18.322-06:00Comments on The Iron Chariot: Why "The Iron Chariot"?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01685900433875775382noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6985506669240251538.post-51124992684336932622008-05-20T23:37:00.000-06:002008-05-20T23:37:00.000-06:00Gerry,Fristly, the beginning of the verse "the LOR...Gerry,<BR/>Fristly, the beginning of the verse "the LORD was with Judah" implies certain things. Namely the LORD doing the work for Judah or at least being the guiding hand for his actions... therefore Judah's inability to defeat the "chariots of iron" is a direct reflection on that which guided his hand, ie. the LORD. No matter how you spin this, the Lords will is defeated by iron chariots.<BR/><BR/>Secondly, since when does the singular pronoun "he" ever refer to a group of people... "the tribe of Judah." <BR/><BR/>(If your initial reaction to this second challange is, "he" refers solely to Judag as a representative of his tribe I encourage you to re-read the first part of my challange)GreatScott!https://www.blogger.com/profile/03227950403206072575noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6985506669240251538.post-47829886147598039012008-04-13T00:08:00.000-06:002008-04-13T00:08:00.000-06:00The pronoun "he" in the verse refers to the tribe ...The pronoun "he" in the verse refers to the tribe of Judah, not the Lord.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com